Muslim Inbreeding: Impacts on intelligence, sanity, health and society

They should have laws against cousins marrying Yuck! It explains alot about their values.

Explains a lot.....

What a laugh. Men in America dash off to sperm banks, records are sealed and you could be marrying your own half brother or sister without ever knowing it. Children are put up for adoption with the same results. In certain areas of America cousins marry frequently -- example is the "bonnie and clyde" couple on the run -- engaged first cousins. Perhaps we should not be so quick to point fingers.

Is this study then, by what it did not directly study, an implied suggestion that the smartest humans would possibly come from a complete melange of ethnic and racial bloodlines?

The article was, on its face, intended to be objective, with the possible exception of the conclusions. i dont know how well it succeeded, which is possibly why BEAZ used his sarcasm. The conclusions that were reported in the article (not necessarily the study) failed to compare one group of somewhat homogenous people with another similarly homogenous group of people but of a different behavior pattern, so any conclusions are really speculative at this point in time.

That there were conclusions which alluded to WESTERN concerns as well as Muslim concerns (whatever that means in a scientific sense, if anything), gives this seed a very eerie character, as if eugenics is good for some, but not for others, or certain types of eugenic behaviors are superior to others.

I am certainly not refuting the dangers, both physical and emotional, of human inbreeding past a generation or two. but to be fair to MUSLIMS, of which i am not one, this article about this study gives me the creeps, both as to its scientific extent (no link to the study was posted) as well as its potential intent as a tease for the extremist mentality.

BAEZ has one justifiable conclusion - fingers have joints, and can bend back toward their owners very quickly.

GARRISON, perhaps you could elaborate?

Garrison - it is now clear to me that you seeded this as a prejudicial diatribe. i was giving you the benefit of the doubt, but this response uncovers your true feelings.

the article itself is a jumble of inductive reasonings, filled with many independent studies that have been cherry-picked to support the title, hence the hypothesis of the article. this is not science.

your name-calling of baez cannot be substantiated by what was written. instead you not-so-cleverly transferred your own behavior onto this person:

viners like BAEZ are to be ignored- I don't waste my time with intellectual dishonesty, no matter how cleverly it is disguised.

your conclusion that the entire muslim world adheres to ancient ideology due to in-breeding has absolutely no scientific meaning and cannot be proven in any way other than persuasion via emotional language.

Let us not forget how mant of these ISLAMIC TERRORISTS are "educated" yet they embraced suicidal tendencies. Not a perfect biological model, is it?

what biological model are you speaking of? is it the perfect model of ancient rome, or persia, or greece, or spain, or portugal, or belgium, or england, or the us of a, or atilla the hun, or any number of south asian civilizations? can you prove that any in-breeding among these folks had nothing to do with their ´perfect´form of genocide and terror?

the 15,833 terror attacks you refer to are ALL the result of ´muslim´inbreeding? really. many of them pit muslim against muslim, who have fundamental and ancient differences that they have not yet worked out, much like the many tribes in europe or africa who still continue to attack each other from time to time. in the last century, terrifying deaths destroying the lives of tens of millions were perpetrated, not by in-bred muslims, but by in-bred christians and jews, against each other.

you do not see the invasions of iraq and afghanistan as TERROR ATTACKS, but that is exactly what they are, and they are responsible for millions of deaths in less than ten years. the terror attacks in OKC and NYC were carried out, not by muslims, but christians and jews, and killed thousands of christians and jews.

lastly, the christians are the infidels. if you insist in seperating yourself from them, what group will launch a war against them, if not another group of them?

that some muslims (your inept characterization of a very large and culturally varied group of adherents to the teachings of mohammed), most of whom want nothing to do with terror in any way, are now a bit pissed off at 150 years of constant manipulation, domination and murder at the hands of nationalized christians and zionists doesn´t seem too unusual a behavior when compared to around 7000 years of continuous human mayhem, mano a mano.

i think BAEZ had you pegged from the get go. i just flushed you out into the open.